Lees, R v [2002] NICC 2449 (25 February 2000)
The application to assign a new solicitor is refused as no good and substantial reason was offered; the interests of justice, the accused, and public funds do not warrant a change when an experienced solicitor has already been assigned.
- Citation
- [2002] NICC 2449
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Accused: William Colin John Lees; Assigned Solicitor: Kearney Kelly & Co.; Applicant Solicitor: Madden & Finucane
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Transfer of Defence Certificate
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Solicitor, Transfer of Defence Certificate, Legal Representation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
William Colin John Lees
Accused
Kearney Kelly & Co.
Assigned Solicitor
Madden & Finucane
Applicant Solicitor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Transfer of Defence Certificate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should allow the transfer of a criminal aid defence certificate from the assigned solicitor to another solicitor
- 2 Whether a new solicitor can be assigned under the Legal Aid, Advice and Assistance (NI) Order 1981
Ratio Decidendi
The application to assign a new solicitor is refused as no good and substantial reason was offered; the interests of justice, the accused, and public funds do not warrant a change when an experienced solicitor has already been assigned.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- The solicitor assigned by the magistrates’ court to represent the accused will remain so assigned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment