Anderson v BC Plant JCB Limited R Kennedy & Co (NI) Limited ... BC Plant JCB Limited R Kennedy & Co (NI) Limited (Breach of Contract Redundancy Payment Other) [2019] NIIT 08551_17IT (22 October 2019)
The tribunal found that the claimants were employed by BC Plant Ltd, that a service provision change occurred when R Kennedy & Co (NI) Limited took over the JCB dealer agreement, and that the claimants' employment transferred accordingly. The second respondent unfairly dismissed the first claimant and failed to pay...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] NIIT 08551_17IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Stewart Anderson; Claimant: Brian Anderson; Respondent: BC Plant JCB Limited; Respondent: R Kennedy & Co (NI) Limited; Respondent: BC Plant Ltd (In Administration)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Claims upheld in part. Awards made for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and breach of duty to inform and consult.
- Legal Topics
- Service Provision Change, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy Payment, Breach of Contract, Duty to Inform and Consult
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stewart Anderson
Claimant
Brian Anderson
Claimant
BC Plant JCB Limited
Respondent
R Kennedy & Co (NI) Limited
Respondent
BC Plant Ltd (In Administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Who was the legal employer of the claimants?
- 2 Did a service provision change occur under the Service Provision Change (Protection of Employment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006?
- 3 Were the claimants entitled to remedies for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and redundancy?
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimants were employed by BC Plant Ltd, that a service provision change occurred when R Kennedy & Co (NI) Limited took over the JCB dealer agreement, and that the claimants' employment transferred accordingly. The second respondent unfairly dismissed the first claimant and failed to pay notice to the second claimant. Both the second and third respondents breached the duty to inform and consult under the Regulations.
Court Disposition
Claims upheld in part. Awards made for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and breach of duty to inform and consult.
Orders
- Second respondent to pay £26,210.17 to the first claimant for unfair dismissal.
- Second respondent to pay £598.88 to the second claimant for notice pay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment