BC v McGilloway (as Controller of a patient) [2022] NIFam 29 (28 September 2022)
The appeal was dismissed because BC had a clear conflict of interest as she was about to be sued for unaccounted funds belonging to the patient, and there was a significant family dispute. The Master exercised her discretion correctly in appointing a professional controller in the best interests of the patient.
- Citation
- [2022] NIFam 29
- Parties
- Appellant: BC; Respondent: Carmel McGilloway; Intervenor: CD; Intervenor: DE
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Appointment of Controller
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Controller, Conflict of Interest, Best Interests of Patient, Judicial Discretion, Family Disputes in Controllership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BC
Appellant
Carmel McGilloway
Respondent
CD
Intervenor
DE
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Appointment of Controller
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master erred in appointing a professional controller instead of a family member
- 2 Whether BC was suitable for appointment as controller given alleged financial impropriety and family dispute
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because BC had a clear conflict of interest as she was about to be sued for unaccounted funds belonging to the patient, and there was a significant family dispute. The Master exercised her discretion correctly in appointing a professional controller in the best interests of the patient.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Carmel McGilloway to remain as controller of the patient's affairs
- Costs to be determined after hearing the parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment