Murray v Belfast Education & Library Bo... [2009] NIIT 1063_08IT (23 January 2009)

Murray v Belfast Education & Library Bo... [2009] NIIT 1063_08IT (23 January 2009)

The claim form does not contain a freestanding complaint of public interest disclosure; it contains a complaint of victimisation only, as the alleged disclosure occurred after the claim was lodged.

Citation
[2009] NIIT 1063
Parties
Claimant: Daniel Murray; Respondent: Belfast Education & Library Board; Respondent: Miss Jill Dowie
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
23 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
Outcome
The claim form contains a complaint of victimisation only; consideration of amendment to include public interest disclosure is adjourned.
Legal Topics
Victimisation, Public Interest Disclosure, Amendment of Claim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Murray

Claimant

Belfast Education & Library Board

Respondent

Miss Jill Dowie

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review

  1. 1 Whether the claim form contains a freestanding complaint of public interest disclosure
  2. 2 Whether the claim contains a complaint of victimisation only
  3. 3 Whether the claim should be amended to include a claim for public interest disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The claim form does not contain a freestanding complaint of public interest disclosure; it contains a complaint of victimisation only, as the alleged disclosure occurred after the claim was lodged.

Court Disposition

The claim form contains a complaint of victimisation only; consideration of amendment to include public interest disclosure is adjourned.

Orders

  • Adjournment of consideration of amendment to allow claimant to make any appropriate application by way of a new claim.