Lavelle v British Bakeries Ltd [2008] NIFET 343_04FET (14 November 2008)
Claimant failed to provide evidence of appropriate comparators or facts from which tribunal could infer discrimination or victimisation; commission differences were justified by business reasons and not tainted by religion; no evidence of less favourable treatment or victimisation.
- Citation
- [2008] NIFET 343_04FET
- Parties
- Claimant: Conn Lavelle; Respondent: Billy Thompson; Respondent: Colin Reed; Respondent: British Bakeries Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Religious Discrimination, Victimisation, Commission Payments, Comparators, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conn Lavelle
Claimant
Billy Thompson
Respondent
Colin Reed
Respondent
British Bakeries Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant was treated less favourably on grounds of religion in van route changes
- 2 Whether claimant was treated less favourably on grounds of religion regarding commission payments
- 3 Whether claimant was treated less favourably on grounds of religion in van repairs and treatment during last weeks of contract
Ratio Decidendi
Claimant failed to provide evidence of appropriate comparators or facts from which tribunal could infer discrimination or victimisation; commission differences were justified by business reasons and not tainted by religion; no evidence of less favourable treatment or victimisation.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment