Edwards, R v [2003] NICA 11 (3 April 2003)
The trial judge correctly admitted the victim's statements to police as res gestae, properly cautioned the jury regarding the police log, adequately directed the jury on evidential matters, and imposed a sentence proportionate to the aggravating features of the offence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] NICA 11
- Parties
- Applicant: Brian Anthony Edwards; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence, Sentencing Principles, Res Gestae Exception
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Anthony Edwards
Applicant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting hearsay evidence under the res gestae exception
- 2 Whether the police log of radio transmissions was improperly admitted
- 3 Whether the jury was properly directed regarding absence of blood staining
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge correctly admitted the victim's statements to police as res gestae, properly cautioned the jury regarding the police log, adequately directed the jury on evidential matters, and imposed a sentence proportionate to the aggravating features of the offence.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment