C v C [2005] NIMaster 26 (18 March 2005)
The inherited property, although acquired after separation, should be included in the pool of assets but its impact is significantly reduced due to the timing and nature of acquisition. Given the six-year marriage and the circumstances, fairness is achieved by awarding the Petitioner 15% of the combined assets, reflecting both the short duration and the inheritance factor.
- Citation
- [2005] NIMaster 26
- Parties
- Petitioner: C; Respondent: C
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (financial Provision) / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Lump sum order in favour of Petitioner
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Inheritance in Divorce, Short Marriage Financial Provision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C
Petitioner
C
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (financial Provision) / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether inherited property acquired after separation should be included in the matrimonial assets for division
- 2 What weight should be given to the length of the marriage in determining financial provision
Ratio Decidendi
The inherited property, although acquired after separation, should be included in the pool of assets but its impact is significantly reduced due to the timing and nature of acquisition. Given the six-year marriage and the circumstances, fairness is achieved by awarding the Petitioner 15% of the combined assets, reflecting both the short duration and the inheritance factor.
Court Disposition
Lump sum order in favour of Petitioner
Orders
- Respondent to pay Petitioner a lump sum of £330,000, representing 15% of the combined assets
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment