MacSimoin v Cairde [2007] NIIT 1637_05 (3 August 2007)

MacSimoin v Cairde [2007] NIIT 1637_05 (3 August 2007)

The tribunal found no sufficient grounds to vary or revoke its original decision, as the criticisms raised did not demonstrate errors of fact or law, nor did they meet the threshold for review in the interests of justice or procedural mishap.

Citation
[2007] NIIT 1637_05
Parties
Claimant: Micheal MacSimoin; Respondent: Cairde
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
03 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Decision on Review Application
Outcome
application for review dismissed
Legal Topics
Review of Tribunal Decision, Procedural Fairness, Misapplication of Legal Principles
Employment Law Review of Tribunal Decision Procedural Fairness Misapplication of Legal Principles

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Micheal MacSimoin

Claimant

Cairde

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Decision on Review Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal erred in its findings of fact
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal misapplied the legal principles from BHS v Burchell and Polkey v AE Dayton Services Limited
  3. 3 Whether the interests of justice required a review of the decision

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found no sufficient grounds to vary or revoke its original decision, as the criticisms raised did not demonstrate errors of fact or law, nor did they meet the threshold for review in the interests of justice or procedural mishap.

Court Disposition

application for review dismissed