Frampton v McGuigan & Ors (Rev 1) [2018] NIQB 52 (14 September 2018)

Frampton v McGuigan & Ors (Rev 1) [2018] NIQB 52 (14 September 2018)

The Northern Ireland court was first seised of the proceedings as service of Frampton's writs on the Cyclone Connection preceded service of the English claim on Frampton. Neither Barry nor Sandra McGuigan is domiciled in Northern Ireland, but the claims against the companies registered in Northern Ireland and the close connection of the claims justify jurisdiction. The Cyclone Connection failed to establish that England is clearly or distinctly more appropriate as a forum. The applications to stay or strike out the proceedings in Northern Ireland are refused.

Citation
[2018] NIQB 52
Parties
Plaintiff: Carl Frampton; First Defendant: Finbar Patrick “Barry” McGuigan; Second Defendant: Sandra McGuigan; Third Defendant: Cyclone Promotions (UK) Limited; Defendant (second Claim): Cyclone Promotions Limited
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
05 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Litigation (jurisdictional Challenge) / Interlocutory Application on Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens
Outcome
Applications to stay or strike out the proceedings in Northern Ireland refused; Northern Ireland court retains jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, Domicile, Service of Process, Lis Alibi Pendens, Contractual Disputes, Company Directorship and Liability
Civil Procedure Conflict of Laws Contract Law Company Law Jurisdiction Forum Non Conveniens Domicile Service of Process +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carl Frampton

Plaintiff

Finbar Patrick “Barry” McGuigan

First Defendant

Sandra McGuigan

Second Defendant

Cyclone Promotions (UK) Limited

Third Defendant

Cyclone Promotions Limited

Defendant (second Claim)

Procedural Posture

Commercial Civil Litigation (jurisdictional Challenge) / Interlocutory Application on Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the Northern Ireland court have jurisdiction under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 to hear the First and/or Second Claim?
  2. 2 If so, should the proceedings be stayed on the ground of forum non conveniens in favour of the English courts?

Ratio Decidendi

The Northern Ireland court was first seised of the proceedings as service of Frampton's writs on the Cyclone Connection preceded service of the English claim on Frampton. Neither Barry nor Sandra McGuigan is domiciled in Northern Ireland, but the claims against the companies registered in Northern Ireland and the close connection of the claims justify jurisdiction. The Cyclone Connection failed to establish that England is clearly or distinctly more appropriate as a forum. The applications to stay or strike out the proceedings in Northern Ireland are refused.

Court Disposition

Applications to stay or strike out the proceedings in Northern Ireland refused; Northern Ireland court retains jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Proceedings in Northern Ireland to continue.
  • No stay or dismissal on grounds of forum non conveniens.