McVeigh v Chieftain Trailers Ltd (Breach of Contract Unfair Dismissal) [2022] NIit 22995_19IT (11 March 2022)
The claimant’s claims were brought outside the applicable statutory time-limits and, in the absence of evidence from the claimant to show it was not reasonably practicable to bring his claims within the time, the tribunal could not exercise discretion to extend time. The tribunal therefore lacks jurisdiction.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] NIit 22995_19IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Conor McVeigh; Respondent: Chieftain Trailers Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Jurisdiction, Statutory Time Limits
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conor McVeigh
Claimant
Chieftain Trailers Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract by reason of the claims having been brought outside the applicable time-limits
- 2 Whether time should be extended to confirm jurisdiction on the tribunal and to enable the claimant to continue with his claims
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant’s claims were brought outside the applicable statutory time-limits and, in the absence of evidence from the claimant to show it was not reasonably practicable to bring his claims within the time, the tribunal could not exercise discretion to extend time. The tribunal therefore lacks jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed
Orders
- The claimant’s claims are dismissed in their entirety
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment