KR and SR, Re [2007] NICA 50 (03 December 2007)
There is no clear and compelling evidence of a grave risk of harm to the children if returned to Slovakia. The children's genuine objections do not constitute wholly exceptional circumstances to override the Convention's purpose and the father's Article 8 rights. The appeal is dismissed and the return order affirmed.
- Citation
- [2007] NICA 50
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: JR; Defendant/respondent: SIR
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Custody, Hague Convention, Children's Views, Grave Risk Exception, ECHR Article 8
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JR
Plaintiff/appellant
SIR
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a grave risk of psychological or physical harm to the children if returned to Slovakia under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the children's objections and maturity justify refusal to return under Article 13
- 3 Whether the father's Article 8 ECHR rights are infringed by refusal to return
Ratio Decidendi
There is no clear and compelling evidence of a grave risk of harm to the children if returned to Slovakia. The children's genuine objections do not constitute wholly exceptional circumstances to override the Convention's purpose and the father's Article 8 rights. The appeal is dismissed and the return order affirmed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of Morgan J affirmed
- Return of children KR and SR to Slovakia
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment