McGowan v McGowan [2015] NIFam 11 (16 June 2015)
The petitioner's misconduct in prolonging proceedings justified the existing order for him to pay one third of the respondent's costs; there was no basis to exclude expert witness costs or to award costs to either party beyond the existing order.
- Citation
- [2015] NIFam 11
- Parties
- Petitioner: David McGowan; Respondent: Christabel McGowan
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (family/matrimonial) / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Existing costs order stands; no further costs awarded to either party.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Costs Orders, Litigation Misconduct, Calderbank Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David McGowan
Petitioner
Christabel McGowan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (family/matrimonial) / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner's liability for costs should exclude expert witness costs
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to costs against the respondent
- 3 Whether the respondent is entitled to all her costs against the petitioner
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner's misconduct in prolonging proceedings justified the existing order for him to pay one third of the respondent's costs; there was no basis to exclude expert witness costs or to award costs to either party beyond the existing order.
Court Disposition
Existing costs order stands; no further costs awarded to either party.
Orders
- Petitioner to pay one third of respondent's costs, including expert witness costs.
- No costs awarded to petitioner against respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment