McMaster v McCoy (Statement of Pay / Wages) [2004] NIIT 316_03 (12 January 2004)

McMaster v McCoy (Statement of Pay / Wages) [2004] NIIT 316_03 (12 January 2004)

The applicant was not paid for three weeks of employment and was not provided with a statement of pay, entitling him to the claimed sum and a declaration of breach.

Citation
[2004] NIIT 316_03
Parties
Applicant: Christopher McMaster; Respondent: Andrew McCoy
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
12 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
applicant's claims upheld
Legal Topics
Statement of Pay, Unpaid Wages, Employment Rights
Employment Law Statement of Pay Unpaid Wages Employment Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher McMaster

Applicant

Andrew McCoy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was paid for three weeks of employment
  2. 2 Whether the respondent provided a statement of pay as required by law

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was not paid for three weeks of employment and was not provided with a statement of pay, entitling him to the claimed sum and a declaration of breach.

Court Disposition

applicant's claims upheld

Orders

  • Respondent to pay applicant £717.00 for three weeks net wages
  • Declaration that respondent failed to provide a statement of pay