McMaster v McCoy [2004] NIIT 316_03 (12 January 2004)

McMaster v McCoy [2004] NIIT 316_03 (12 January 2004)

The applicant was entitled to three weeks net pay as he was not paid for his employment, and the respondent failed to provide a pay statement as required by law.

Citation
[2004] NIIT 316
Parties
Applicant: Christopher McMaster; Respondent: Andrew McCoy
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
12 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Final Decision
Outcome
applicant's claims upheld
Legal Topics
Unpaid Wages, Failure to Provide Pay Statement
Employment Law Unpaid Wages Failure to Provide Pay Statement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher McMaster

Applicant

Andrew McCoy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to three weeks net pay
  2. 2 Whether the respondent failed to provide a pay statement

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was entitled to three weeks net pay as he was not paid for his employment, and the respondent failed to provide a pay statement as required by law.

Court Disposition

applicant's claims upheld

Orders

  • Respondent to pay applicant £717.00 for three weeks net wages
  • Declaration that respondent failed to provide a pay statement