O’'Neill, R v [2017] NICC 3 (3 February 2017)

O’'Neill, R v [2017] NICC 3 (3 February 2017)

The evidence of Professor Mangham, though contradictory and disputed, is not so inherently weak or discredited that it could not conceivably support a guilty verdict. Issues of credibility and reliability are for the jury. Additionally, other expert medical evidence supports the Crown's case. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence for the jury to reasonably find the defendant guilty of murder, and the application of no case to answer is dismissed.

Citation
[2017] NICC 3
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Christopher O'Neill
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
03 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Outcome
defence application dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Manslaughter, No Case to Answer, Expert Evidence, Mens Rea
Criminal Law Murder Manslaughter No Case to Answer Expert Evidence Mens Rea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Christopher O'Neill

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Ruling on No Case to Answer

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a case to answer for murder based on the evidence presented
  2. 2 Reliability and credibility of expert medical evidence
  3. 3 Whether evidence supports intention to cause grievous bodily harm

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of Professor Mangham, though contradictory and disputed, is not so inherently weak or discredited that it could not conceivably support a guilty verdict. Issues of credibility and reliability are for the jury. Additionally, other expert medical evidence supports the Crown's case. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence for the jury to reasonably find the defendant guilty of murder, and the application of no case to answer is dismissed.

Court Disposition

defence application dismissed

Orders

  • The application of no case to answer is dismissed.