CHW v CMJ [2008] NIFam 14 (8 December 2008)
The welfare of the youngest child is best served by continuing residence with the mother, with augmented contact arrangements for the applicant, and restrictions on further applications to prevent detrimental litigation.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] NIFam 14
- Parties
- Applicant: CHW; Respondent: CMJ
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Residence and Contact Orders / Final Judgment After Welfare Hearing and Fact Finding
- Outcome
- Residence order for youngest child remains with respondent; contact order for applicant augmented; indirect contact for second youngest child; restriction on further applications for three years.
- Legal Topics
- Residence Order, Contact Order, Child Protection, Emotional Harm, Interim Care Order, Supervision Order, Section 91(14) Restrictions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHW
Applicant
CMJ
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Residence and Contact Orders / Final Judgment After Welfare Hearing and Fact Finding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether residence of the youngest child should be with the applicant or respondent
- 2 Whether contact between applicant and children should be supervised
- 3 Risk of emotional harm to the youngest child
Ratio Decidendi
The welfare of the youngest child is best served by continuing residence with the mother, with augmented contact arrangements for the applicant, and restrictions on further applications to prevent detrimental litigation.
Court Disposition
Residence order for youngest child remains with respondent; contact order for applicant augmented; indirect contact for second youngest child; restriction on further applications for three years.
Orders
- Applicant to have staying contact with youngest child on specified dates and holidays.
- Handovers to be facilitated by independent third party or voluntary driver, costs shared equally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment