Ondruska v City Link Ltd (In Administrati...Department for the Economy [2016] NIIT 00419_16IT (24 May 2016)
The tribunal found that the claimant was within the scope of the relevant protective award and is entitled to payment from the Department under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
- Citation
- [2016] NIIT 00419_16IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Peter Ondruska; Respondent: City Link Ltd (In Administration); Respondent: Department for the Economy
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Appeal Regarding Payment Under Protective Award
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Remuneration, Statutory Guarantee, Employment Rights Order 1996, Appeal Against Refusal of Payment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Ondruska
Claimant
City Link Ltd (In Administration)
Respondent
Department for the Economy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Appeal Regarding Payment Under Protective Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was within the scope of the protective award
- 2 Whether the Department for the Economy is required to make a payment to the claimant under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was within the scope of the relevant protective award and is entitled to payment from the Department under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The Department for the Economy is to make a payment to the claimant under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996 in respect of remuneration under the protective award.
- If the amount due is not agreed, a remedies hearing will be arranged pursuant to Article 233 of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment