Neill v City Link Ltd (In Administrati...Department for the Economy [2016] NIIT 00418_16IT (24 May 2016)
The tribunal found the claimant was within the scope of the relevant protective award and is entitled to payment from the Department under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
- Citation
- [2016] NIIT 00418_16IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Stephen Neill; Respondent: City Link Ltd (In Administration); Respondent: Department for the Economy
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Decision on Appeal Regarding Payment Under Protective Award
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Remuneration, Statutory Guarantee, Appeal Against Refusal of Payment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Neill
Claimant
City Link Ltd (In Administration)
Respondent
Department for the Economy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Decision on Appeal Regarding Payment Under Protective Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment from the Department under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996 in respect of remuneration due under a protective award against City Link Ltd (In Administration)
- 2 Whether the claimant was within the scope of the relevant protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found the claimant was within the scope of the relevant protective award and is entitled to payment from the Department under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The Department for the Economy must make a payment to the claimant under Article 227 of the Employment Rights Order 1996 in respect of remuneration under the protective award.
- If the parties cannot agree on the amount due, a remedies hearing will be arranged pursuant to Article 233 of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment