Montgomery v Bennett [2010] NIIT 6509_09IT (13 April 2010)
The tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred to BC (NI) Ltd under TUPE on 1 December 2008, making BC (NI) Ltd liable for redundancy and unpaid wage claims arising after that date. The claimant was entitled to redundancy pay, final week's wages, and back pay, less statutory deductions.
- Citation
- [2010] NIIT 6509_09IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Helen Montgomery; Respondent: Craig Bennett; Respondent: Dreemore Developments Ltd (in administration); Respondent: BC (NI) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Payment, Unpaid Wages, Transfer of Undertakings (tupe), Breach of Contract, Employment Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen Montgomery
Claimant
Craig Bennett
Respondent
Dreemore Developments Ltd (in administration)
Respondent
BC (NI) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment and unpaid wages following termination of employment
- 2 Which respondent is liable for the payments due to the claimant after business transfer under TUPE
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred to BC (NI) Ltd under TUPE on 1 December 2008, making BC (NI) Ltd liable for redundancy and unpaid wage claims arising after that date. The claimant was entitled to redundancy pay, final week's wages, and back pay, less statutory deductions.
Court Disposition
claim allowed in part
Orders
- BC (NI) Ltd to pay the claimant £2,641.54 in respect of redundancy payment and unpaid wages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment