Hargan, R v [2008] NICC 33 (30 September 2008)

Hargan, R v [2008] NICC 33 (30 September 2008)

The defendant is sentenced for manslaughter, not murder, due to insufficient evidence of intent. The sentence is determined by the brutality of the crime, mitigating factors, and the need for statutory supervision to minimise risk of re-offending.

Citation
[2008] NICC 33
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Daniel Martin Hargan
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
30 September 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Sentencing, Probation Order, Alcohol Related Crime
Criminal Law Manslaughter Sentencing Probation Order Alcohol Related Crime

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Daniel Martin Hargan

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should be sentenced for manslaughter instead of murder
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence and supervision for manslaughter involving extreme violence

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant is sentenced for manslaughter, not murder, due to insufficient evidence of intent. The sentence is determined by the brutality of the crime, mitigating factors, and the need for statutory supervision to minimise risk of re-offending.

Court Disposition

convicted

Orders

  • 7 years' imprisonment
  • 1 year's probation supervision to commence upon release