Warke v Creative Composites (Detriment / Victimisation) [2004] NIIT 3132_01 (20 May 2004)

Warke v Creative Composites (Detriment / Victimisation) [2004] NIIT 3132_01 (20 May 2004)

The evidence did not establish that the applicant's non-promotion was due to his trade union activities or that the recruitment process was manipulated to disadvantage him; deficiencies in the process did not specifically disadvantage the applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] NIIT 3132_01
Parties
Applicant: Darren Warke; Respondent: Creative Composites
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
20 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Detriment, Victimisation, Trade Union Activities, Promotion, Recruitment Process
Employment Law Detriment Victimisation Trade Union Activities Promotion Recruitment Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Darren Warke

Applicant

Creative Composites

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant suffered a detriment for trade union activities
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was victimised contrary to the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
  3. 3 Whether the recruitment process was discriminatory or improperly conducted

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not establish that the applicant's non-promotion was due to his trade union activities or that the recruitment process was manipulated to disadvantage him; deficiencies in the process did not specifically disadvantage the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed