Warke v Creative Composites [2004] NIIT 3132_01 (20 May 2004)

Warke v Creative Composites [2004] NIIT 3132_01 (20 May 2004)

The evidence did not establish that the applicant's non-promotion was for the purpose of preventing, deterring, or penalising him for trade union activities. Deficiencies in the recruitment process did not specifically disadvantage the applicant, and there was no evidence of improper marking or contrived criteria.

Citation
[2004] NIIT 3132
Parties
Applicant: Darren Warke; Respondent: Creative Composites
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
20 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Trade Union Activities, Victimisation, Promotion, Detriment, Recruitment Process
Employment Law Trade Union Activities Victimisation Promotion Detriment Recruitment Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Darren Warke

Applicant

Creative Composites

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant suffered a detriment for trade union activities contrary to Articles 68(1)(a) and (b), 70(1)(b), and 73(1)(a) and (b) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
  2. 2 Whether the recruitment process was discriminatory or victimised the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not establish that the applicant's non-promotion was for the purpose of preventing, deterring, or penalising him for trade union activities. Deficiencies in the recruitment process did not specifically disadvantage the applicant, and there was no evidence of improper marking or contrived criteria.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed