Fitzsimmons v David Cook [2011] NIIT 2159_10IT (19 January 2011)
The dismissal was automatically unfair due to non-compliance with statutory procedures, warranting a basic award of four weeks' pay; no compensatory award was made as dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses and the claimant did not attend to provide evidence.
- Citation
- [2011] NIIT 2159_10IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Natasha Fitzsimmons; Respondent: David Cook; Respondent: Philip Cook
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claimant was unfairly dismissed; awarded basic compensation; other claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Statutory Dismissal Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natasha Fitzsimmons
Claimant
David Cook
Respondent
Philip Cook
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures were followed
- 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to compensation for unlawful deductions from wages
Ratio Decidendi
The dismissal was automatically unfair due to non-compliance with statutory procedures, warranting a basic award of four weeks' pay; no compensatory award was made as dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses and the claimant did not attend to provide evidence.
Court Disposition
Claimant was unfairly dismissed; awarded basic compensation; other claims dismissed.
Orders
- Award of £256.80 to claimant for unfair dismissal
- Claim for unlawful deductions from wages dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment