Fitzsimmons v David Cook [2011] NIIT 2159_10IT (19 January 2011)

Fitzsimmons v David Cook [2011] NIIT 2159_10IT (19 January 2011)

The dismissal was automatically unfair due to non-compliance with statutory procedures, warranting a basic award of four weeks' pay; no compensatory award was made as dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses and the claimant did not attend to provide evidence.

Citation
[2011] NIIT 2159_10IT
Parties
Claimant: Natasha Fitzsimmons; Respondent: David Cook; Respondent: Philip Cook
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
19 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Claimant was unfairly dismissed; awarded basic compensation; other claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Statutory Dismissal Procedures

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Natasha Fitzsimmons

Claimant

David Cook

Respondent

Philip Cook

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures were followed
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to compensation for unlawful deductions from wages

Ratio Decidendi

The dismissal was automatically unfair due to non-compliance with statutory procedures, warranting a basic award of four weeks' pay; no compensatory award was made as dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses and the claimant did not attend to provide evidence.

Court Disposition

Claimant was unfairly dismissed; awarded basic compensation; other claims dismissed.

Orders

  • Award of £256.80 to claimant for unfair dismissal
  • Claim for unlawful deductions from wages dismissed