Lyness, R. v [2022] NICA 40 (30 June 2022)
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant’s procedural complaints were either self-induced or unfounded, the trial judge acted properly in all circumstances, the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming, and any procedural unfairness did not render the conviction unsafe.
- Citation
- [2022] NICA 40
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant: David Lyness
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (post Trial, Post Verdict)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Right to Fair Trial, Withdrawal of Counsel, Closing Speech, Loss of Control Defence, Bad Character Evidence, Procedural Fairness, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
David Lyness
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (post Trial, Post Verdict)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in permitting counsel to withdraw before closing speeches and not permitting the appellant to make submissions or a closing speech
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred by not discharging the jury after breakdown with counsel
- 3 Whether the trial judge failed to adequately put the applicant’s case to the jury
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant’s procedural complaints were either self-induced or unfounded, the trial judge acted properly in all circumstances, the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming, and any procedural unfairness did not render the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment