Lyness, R. v [2022] NICA 40 (30 June 2022)

Lyness, R. v [2022] NICA 40 (30 June 2022)

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant’s procedural complaints were either self-induced or unfounded, the trial judge acted properly in all circumstances, the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming, and any procedural unfairness did not render the conviction unsafe.

Citation
[2022] NICA 40
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant: David Lyness
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
30 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (post Trial, Post Verdict)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Legal Topics
Murder, Right to Fair Trial, Withdrawal of Counsel, Closing Speech, Loss of Control Defence, Bad Character Evidence, Procedural Fairness, Jury Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

David Lyness

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (post Trial, Post Verdict)

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in permitting counsel to withdraw before closing speeches and not permitting the appellant to make submissions or a closing speech
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred by not discharging the jury after breakdown with counsel
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge failed to adequately put the applicant’s case to the jury

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant’s procedural complaints were either self-induced or unfounded, the trial judge acted properly in all circumstances, the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming, and any procedural unfairness did not render the conviction unsafe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.