Budginas v David Wright t/a Wright Recycl... [2015] NIIT 2733_14IT (23 March 2015)

Budginas v David Wright t/a Wright Recycl... [2015] NIIT 2733_14IT (23 March 2015)

The claimant was entitled to holiday pay and notice pay as the claims were presented within a reasonable period, the respondent failed to give adequate notice, and the claimant's evidence on unpaid holiday was uncontroverted.

Citation
[2015] NIIT 2733_14IT
Parties
Claimant: Deividas Budginas; Respondent: David Wright t/a Wright Recycling
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
23 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Final Decision
Outcome
claims for holiday pay and notice pay upheld; redundancy payment claim denied
Legal Topics
Holiday Pay, Notice Pay, Time Limits for Claims, Redundancy Payment Eligibility
Employment Law Holiday Pay Notice Pay Time Limits for Claims Redundancy Payment Eligibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deividas Budginas

Claimant

David Wright t/a Wright Recycling

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to holiday pay
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay
  3. 3 Whether the claims were presented within the statutory time limits

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was entitled to holiday pay and notice pay as the claims were presented within a reasonable period, the respondent failed to give adequate notice, and the claimant's evidence on unpaid holiday was uncontroverted.

Court Disposition

claims for holiday pay and notice pay upheld; redundancy payment claim denied

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £576 in respect of holiday pay.
  • Respondent to pay claimant £262 in respect of notice pay.