McFeely v Declan Corry Musgrave Retail Partners Ltd N... DNA Retail Limited Post Office [2013] NIIT 248_13IT (01 August 2013)
The tribunal found the respondent had a reasonable suspicion amounting to a belief in the claimant’s misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and carried out as much investigation as was reasonable in the circumstances. The disciplinary and appeal procedures were fair and transparent. The claimant’s failures in management duties, including non-compliance with required procedures, justified dismissal for gross misconduct. The dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. The only contractual entitlement due was one week’s holiday pay for 2011 and overtime worked between 10 April 2010 and 14 January 2012 at the contractual rate.
- Citation
- [2013] NIIT 248_13IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Geralyn Mary McFeely; Respondent: Declan Corry; Respondent: Musgrave Retail Partners Ltd NI; Respondent: DNA Retail Limited; Respondent: Post Office
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal (northern Ireland) Unfair Dismissal and Contractual Entitlements / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimant's unfair dismissal complaint dismissed; claim for breach of contract partially upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Holiday Pay, Overtime Pay, Disciplinary Procedures, Gross Misconduct, TUPE Transfers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geralyn Mary McFeely
Claimant
Declan Corry
Respondent
Musgrave Retail Partners Ltd NI
Respondent
DNA Retail Limited
Respondent
Post Office
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal (northern Ireland) Unfair Dismissal and Contractual Entitlements / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to pay the claimant statutory or contractual entitlements (notice, holidays, overtime)
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found the respondent had a reasonable suspicion amounting to a belief in the claimant’s misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and carried out as much investigation as was reasonable in the circumstances. The disciplinary and appeal procedures were fair and transparent. The claimant’s failures in management duties, including non-compliance with required procedures, justified dismissal for gross misconduct. The dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. The only contractual entitlement due was one week’s holiday pay for 2011 and overtime worked between 10 April 2010 and 14 January 2012 at the contractual rate.
Court Disposition
Claimant's unfair dismissal complaint dismissed; claim for breach of contract partially upheld.
Orders
- The claimant was fairly dismissed.
- The respondent is to pay the claimant £705.04 for one week’s net holiday pay for 2011 and overtime worked between 10 April 2010 and 14 January 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment