McCann v Department for Employment & Le... Malcolm McKibbin Alan Shannon Jason Foy HR Connect Capita PLC Fujitsu UK & Ireland [2012] NIIT 00920_12IT (10 January 0 2012)

McCann v Department for Employment & Le... Malcolm McKibbin Alan Shannon Jason Foy HR Connect Capita PLC Fujitsu UK & Ireland [2012] NIIT 00920_12IT (10 January 0 2012)

The claimant's application for interim relief was refused due to insufficient grounds, and the second to seventh-named respondents were dismissed from proceedings as a consequence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 00920_12IT
Parties
Claimant: Colin McCann; Respondent: Department for Employment & Learning; Respondent: Malcolm McKibbin; Respondent: Alan Shannon; Respondent: Jason Foy; Respondent: HR Connect; Respondent: Capita PLC; Respondent: Fujitsu UK & Ireland
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Interim Relief Application
Outcome
Interim relief refused; respondents dismissed from proceedings; substantive claim to be listed for hearing.
Legal Topics
Interim Relief, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Interim Relief Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin McCann

Claimant

Department for Employment & Learning

Respondent

Malcolm McKibbin

Respondent

Alan Shannon

Respondent

Jason Foy

Respondent

HR Connect

Respondent

Capita PLC

Respondent

Fujitsu UK & Ireland

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Interim Relief Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interim relief should be granted pending determination of unfair dismissal complaint
  2. 2 Whether respondents should be dismissed from proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's application for interim relief was refused due to insufficient grounds, and the second to seventh-named respondents were dismissed from proceedings as a consequence.

Court Disposition

Interim relief refused; respondents dismissed from proceedings; substantive claim to be listed for hearing.

Orders

  • Claimant's application for interim relief refused
  • Second to seventh-named respondents dismissed from proceedings