Fitzpatrick v Department for Social Developm...Geraldine Devine Judith Woodburn [2015] NIIT 01763_14IT (09 July 2015)
Strike-out was refused because, despite the claimant's non-attendance at hearings and objections to dates, she engaged with the process through correspondence, was not obliged to attend, and her conduct did not cross the threshold for striking out her claims.
- Citation
- [2015] NIIT 01763_14IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Karen Fitzpatrick; Respondent: Department for Social Development; Respondent: Geraldine Devine; Respondent: Judith Woodburn
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review on Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Respondents' application for strike-out refused.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Part Time Worker Detriment, Strike Out Applications, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karen Fitzpatrick
Claimant
Department for Social Development
Respondent
Geraldine Devine
Respondent
Judith Woodburn
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review on Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's claims should be struck out for unreasonable and vexatious conduct and persistent failure to comply with tribunal directions
Ratio Decidendi
Strike-out was refused because, despite the claimant's non-attendance at hearings and objections to dates, she engaged with the process through correspondence, was not obliged to attend, and her conduct did not cross the threshold for striking out her claims.
Court Disposition
Respondents' application for strike-out refused.
Orders
- Case Management Discussion to be arranged to prepare the claim for hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment