Stringer v Derek Brennan Gail Brennan t/a The Madhatter... [2011] NIIT 01760_10IT (22 June 2011)

The tribunal found it just and equitable to extend time for the review, added Gail Brennan t/a The Madhatters as a respondent upon being satisfied she was the employer, and awarded costs against the respondents for unreasonable conduct necessitating the review hearing.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2011] NIIT 01760_10IT
Parties: Claimant: Patricia Stringer; Respondent: Derek Brennan; Respondent: Gail Brennan t/a The Madhatters
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 22 June 2011
Procedural Posture: Industrial Tribunal Review / Decision on Review
Outcome: Application for review allowed; time extended; respondent added; costs awarded against respondents.
Legal Topics: Review of Tribunal Decision, Extension of Time, Costs, Employer Identification

Employment Law Review of Tribunal Decision Extension of Time Costs Employer Identification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Patricia Stringer

Claimant

Derek Brennan

Respondent

Gail Brennan t/a The Madhatters

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal Review / Decision on Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether the review application was out of time and if time should be extended
2 Whether Gail Brennan t/a The Madhatters should be added as a respondent
3 Whether costs should be awarded against the respondents

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for review allowed; time extended; respondent added; costs awarded against respondents.

Orders

Time for review application extended to 14 June 2011
Gail Brennan t/a The Madhatters added as respondent

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.