Bruce v Diamond Systems [2010] NIIT 01081_10IT (10 February 2011)

Bruce v Diamond Systems [2010] NIIT 01081_10IT (10 February 2011)

The tribunal found the respondent's redundancy selection process was fair, objective, and properly executed, and that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The claimant was entitled to unpaid holiday pay for the period worked in 2010.

Citation
[2010] NIIT 01081_10IT
Parties
Claimant: Lee Bruce; Respondent: Diamond Systems
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
10 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim for unfair dismissal dismissed; claim for unpaid holiday pay upheld.
Legal Topics
Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Holiday Pay
Employment Law Redundancy Unfair Dismissal Holiday Pay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lee Bruce

Claimant

Diamond Systems

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly selected for redundancy and unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid holiday pay

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found the respondent's redundancy selection process was fair, objective, and properly executed, and that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The claimant was entitled to unpaid holiday pay for the period worked in 2010.

Court Disposition

Claim for unfair dismissal dismissed; claim for unpaid holiday pay upheld.

Orders

  • Claimant awarded £90.56 for unpaid holiday pay.