Rice v Dignity Funerals Limited [2017] NIIT 00282_17IT (28 December 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant's interpretation of events was unreasonable and amounted to an overreaction to normal management actions. There was no breach of contract, no sufficiently serious conduct to justify resignation, no evidence of sex or marital status discrimination, and no constructive or unfair dismissal. The refusal to discuss the Scottish meeting in the grievance process did not amount to a breach of contract or discrimination.
- Citation
- [2017] NIIT 00282_17IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Diane Rice; Respondent: Dignity Funerals Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Sex Discrimination, Marital Status Discrimination, Without Prejudice Privilege, Grievance Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diane Rice
Claimant
Dignity Funerals Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the content of the 6 May 2016 meeting was covered by without prejudice privilege
- 2 Whether the claimant was constructively dismissed
- 3 Whether any dismissal was unfair and/or an act of sex discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant's interpretation of events was unreasonable and amounted to an overreaction to normal management actions. There was no breach of contract, no sufficiently serious conduct to justify resignation, no evidence of sex or marital status discrimination, and no constructive or unfair dismissal. The refusal to discuss the Scottish meeting in the grievance process did not amount to a breach of contract or discrimination.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment