McKiernan, R v [2004] NICA 18 (20 May 2004)
The appellant benefited from drug trafficking; assets gifted to wife and mother-in-law for property purchases are caught by the Order; statutory assumptions under Article 10 apply; total realisable assets are £156,299; confiscation order confirmed; appeal dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] NICA 18
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant/defendant: Peter Joseph McKiernan
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Confiscation Orders, Realisable Property, Gifts Caught by Proceeds of Crime, Third Party Interests
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Peter Joseph McKiernan
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant benefited from drug trafficking under the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
- 2 Whether assets gifted to wife and mother-in-law are caught by the Order
- 3 Whether statutory assumptions under Article 10 should be made
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant benefited from drug trafficking; assets gifted to wife and mother-in-law for property purchases are caught by the Order; statutory assumptions under Article 10 apply; total realisable assets are £156,299; confiscation order confirmed; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Confiscation order for £156,299 confirmed
- Appellant to serve two years imprisonment consecutive to drugs sentence in default of payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment