Peifer v Drumglass High School Southern Education and Library... [2013] NIIT 01615_05IT (09 September 2013)

The tribunal found, on the basis of the respondents’ admission of liability in open tribunal, that the respondents unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on the ground of sex.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2013] NIIT 01615_05IT
Parties: Claimant: Robert James Peifer; Respondent: Drumglass High School; Respondent: Southern Education and Library Board
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 09 September 2013
Procedural Posture: Industrial Tribunal / Liability Determination; Remedy Hearing Postponed
Outcome: Liability admitted; remedy hearing postponed
Legal Topics: Sex Discrimination, Unlawful Discrimination

Employment Law Equality Law Sex Discrimination Unlawful Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Robert James Peifer

Claimant

Drumglass High School

Respondent

Southern Education and Library Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Liability Determination; Remedy Hearing Postponed

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondents unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on the ground of sex

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found, on the basis of the respondents’ admission of liability in open tribunal, that the respondents unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on the ground of sex.

Court Disposition

Liability admitted; remedy hearing postponed

Orders

Case postponed for a hearing on remedy at an appropriate time

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.