McDonagh v Event 22 Ltd [2005] NIIT 71_04 (9 May 2005)
The tribunal found that the sixteen-day delay was short, caused by errors of others, and did not prejudice the respondent's ability to defend. It was just and equitable to extend the time for lodging the applications under Article 65(7) of the Race Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1997.
- Citation
- [2005] NIIT 71_04
- Parties
- Claimant: Martin McDonagh; Claimant: Patrick Stokes; Respondent: Event 22 Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Preliminary Jurisdictional Ruling
- Outcome
- Jurisdiction affirmed; extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Jurisdiction, Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin McDonagh
Claimant
Patrick Stokes
Claimant
Event 22 Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Preliminary Jurisdictional Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to hear complaints lodged outside the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether it is just and equitable to extend the time for lodging the originating applications
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the sixteen-day delay was short, caused by errors of others, and did not prejudice the respondent's ability to defend. It was just and equitable to extend the time for lodging the applications under Article 65(7) of the Race Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1997.
Court Disposition
Jurisdiction affirmed; extension of time granted.
Orders
- Title of proceedings amended to Event 22 Limited
- Extension of time for lodging originating applications granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment