UCB Homeloans Corporation Ltd v Bennett [2012] NICh 22 (13 June 2012)

UCB Homeloans Corporation Ltd v Bennett [2012] NICh 22 (13 June 2012)

Application for leave to appeal out of time refused due to inordinate and unexplained delay, lack of material to justify extension, prejudice to respondent, and absence of substantive or general points; rules of court and finality must be observed.

Citation
[2012] NICh 22
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: UCB Homeloans Corporation Limited; Defendant/applicant: Patrick John Bennett
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
13 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Possession / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Mortgage Possession, Appeal Procedure
Civil Procedure Property Law Extension of Time Mortgage Possession Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

UCB Homeloans Corporation Limited

Plaintiff/respondent

Patrick John Bennett

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons for Possession / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted for an order of possession in a mortgage case

Ratio Decidendi

Application for leave to appeal out of time refused due to inordinate and unexplained delay, lack of material to justify extension, prejudice to respondent, and absence of substantive or general points; rules of court and finality must be observed.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • application for leave to appeal out of time is refused