Burke & Anor v O'Kane and Devine Construction Ltd [2013] NIQB 83 (28 June 2013)
There was insufficient excuse for failing to comply with the Rules. The defendant did not seek extension before expiry, had avenues to remedy information gaps, and permitting late lodgement would undermine the Rules and set a dangerous precedent.
- Citation
- [2013] NIQB 83
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Kevin Burke; Plaintiff/appellant: Phyllis Burke; Defendant/respondent: O'Kane and Devine Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; permission for late lodgement refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Late Lodgement, Building Disputes, Negligence, Breach of Contract, Breach of Statutory Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Burke
Plaintiff/appellant
Phyllis Burke
Plaintiff/appellant
O'Kane and Devine Construction Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient excuse exists for late lodgement under Order 43 Rule 10 of the County Court Rules (Northern Ireland) 1981
- 2 Whether the defendant should be permitted to make a late payment into court
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient excuse for failing to comply with the Rules. The defendant did not seek extension before expiry, had avenues to remedy information gaps, and permitting late lodgement would undermine the Rules and set a dangerous precedent.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; permission for late lodgement refused
Orders
- Decision of County Court reversed
- Permission for lodgement refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment