Hamiltonand others v Fire and Flooring Systems Ltd Roy Bell Simon Bell Pyroseal Ltd Roy Adamson Pyroseal NI Ltd [2015] NIIT 00557_15IT (18 August 2015)
The tribunal found that only Mr Warnock's employment transferred to the sixth-named respondent under TUPE; all other claimants did not transfer and are entitled to redundancy and other payments from the first-named respondent.
- Citation
- [2015] NIIT 00557_15IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Renwick Mark Hamilton; Claimant: Alexander James Gemmell; Claimant: Thomas Stewart; Claimant: Robert Noel Lindsay; Claimant: Roy William Crawford; Claimant: Samuel Annett; Claimant: Steven Warnock; Claimant: David William Andrew Hodges; Claimant: William John Duffield; Claimant: Steve Greenhill; Claimant: Graham Thomas Nelson; Respondent: Fire and Flooring Systems Ltd; Respondent: Roy Bell; Respondent: Simon Bell; Respondent: Pyroseal Ltd; Respondent: Roy Adamson; Respondent: Pyrotech NI Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Liability Determination
- Outcome
- Partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Pay, Notice Pay, Arrears of Pay, Holiday Pay, Transfer of Undertakings, TUPE
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Renwick Mark Hamilton
Claimant
Alexander James Gemmell
Claimant
Thomas Stewart
Claimant
Robert Noel Lindsay
Claimant
Roy William Crawford
Claimant
Samuel Annett
Claimant
Steven Warnock
Claimant
David William Andrew Hodges
Claimant
William John Duffield
Claimant
Steve Greenhill
Claimant
Graham Thomas Nelson
Claimant
Fire and Flooring Systems Ltd
Respondent
Roy Bell
Respondent
Simon Bell
Respondent
Pyroseal Ltd
Respondent
Roy Adamson
Respondent
Pyrotech NI Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Liability Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are entitled to redundancy pay, notice pay, arrears of pay, and holiday pay from the first-named respondent or whether their employment transferred to the sixth-named respondent under TUPE.
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that only Mr Warnock's employment transferred to the sixth-named respondent under TUPE; all other claimants did not transfer and are entitled to redundancy and other payments from the first-named respondent.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed
Orders
- Mr Warnock's claim for redundancy pay and notice pay is dismissed.
- All other claimants are entitled to redundancy pay and other sums from the first-named respondent; amounts to be detailed in written reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment