Moore v Food Safety Promotion Board [2006] NIFET 29_04FET (20 January 2006)
The amendment to include a claim of race discrimination is permitted as it is not an entirely new claim but a new label on facts already pleaded. The claim for sex discrimination is not permitted as it is a wholly new claim and outside the statutory time limit; it is not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
- Citation
- [2006] NIFET 29_04FET
- Parties
- Claimant: Doctor John Edmund Moore; Respondent: Food Safety Promotion Board
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal Pre Hearing Review / Pre Hearing Review Decision
- Outcome
- Amendment allowed for race discrimination claim; sex discrimination claim dismissed as out of time.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Statutory Time Limits, Amendment of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Doctor John Edmund Moore
Claimant
Food Safety Promotion Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal Pre Hearing Review / Pre Hearing Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the originating application 29/04FET can be amended to include a claim of race discrimination
- 2 Whether the application to amend is within statutory time limits
- 3 Whether it is just and equitable to extend the time limit for a claim of sex discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment to include a claim of race discrimination is permitted as it is not an entirely new claim but a new label on facts already pleaded. The claim for sex discrimination is not permitted as it is a wholly new claim and outside the statutory time limit; it is not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
Court Disposition
Amendment allowed for race discrimination claim; sex discrimination claim dismissed as out of time.
Orders
- Reference 29/04FET is amended to include a claim of discrimination on the grounds of race.
- Application 2914/04 in relation to sex discrimination is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment