Rafferty v Frank J O'Donnell [2013] NIIT 00229_13IT (13 March 2013)

Rafferty v Frank J O'Donnell [2013] NIIT 00229_13IT (13 March 2013)

The claimant's redundancy pay claim is well-founded as the respondent failed to respond and the evidence supported the claim.

Citation
[2013] NIIT 00229_13IT
Parties
Claimant: Sheila Rafferty; Respondent: Frank J O'Donnell
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
13 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Failure to Respond, Default Judgment
Employment Law Redundancy Pay Failure to Respond Default Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sheila Rafferty

Claimant

Frank J O'Donnell

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay from the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's redundancy pay claim is well-founded as the respondent failed to respond and the evidence supported the claim.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • The respondent is liable to make a redundancy payment of £7,955 to the claimant.