Donnelly v Protech Engineering F.J. O'Donnell [2013] NIIT 00345_13IT (23 May 2013)

Donnelly v Protech Engineering F.J. O'Donnell [2013] NIIT 00345_13IT (23 May 2013)

Claimant's redundancy pay claim is well-founded; respondent liable for statutory redundancy payment based on gross weekly pay, years of service, age, and multiplier.

Citation
[2013] NIIT 00345_13IT
Parties
Claimant: Patrick John Donnelly; Respondent: Frank J. O'Donnell trading as Protech Engineering
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
23 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
claim upheld
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Dismissal, Amendment of Respondent Title

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick John Donnelly

Claimant

Frank J. O'Donnell trading as Protech Engineering

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

  1. 1 entitlement to redundancy pay
  2. 2 proper respondent identification

Ratio Decidendi

Claimant's redundancy pay claim is well-founded; respondent liable for statutory redundancy payment based on gross weekly pay, years of service, age, and multiplier.

Court Disposition

claim upheld

Orders

  • Title of first named respondent amended to Frank J. O'Donnell trading as Protech Engineering.
  • Second named respondent dismissed from proceedings.