Watson v Police Misconduct Panel (Re Costs) [2022] NIKB 39 (28 October 2022)
The applicant was unsuccessful in his application and there is no sufficient reason to depart from the normal rule that costs follow the event; the respondent is entitled to an order for costs against the applicant.
- Citation
- [2022] NIKB 39
- Parties
- Applicant: Gareth Watson; Respondent: Police Misconduct Panel; Intervener: Professional Standards Department
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Ruling on Costs
- Outcome
- Applicant to pay respondent’s costs; no order as to costs for intervener.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Judicial Review, Police Misconduct, Jurisdiction of Misconduct Panels
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gareth Watson
Applicant
Police Misconduct Panel
Respondent
Professional Standards Department
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the usual order that costs follow the event should apply in a judicial review raising novel points of law
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded against the applicant
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded in favour of or against the intervener
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was unsuccessful in his application and there is no sufficient reason to depart from the normal rule that costs follow the event; the respondent is entitled to an order for costs against the applicant.
Court Disposition
Applicant to pay respondent’s costs; no order as to costs for intervener.
Orders
- Applicant shall pay the respondent’s costs with those costs to be taxed in default of agreement.
- No order in relation to the costs of the intervener.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment