Bank of Ireland (UK) PLC v McLAUGHLIN [2016] NICA 33 (5 May 2016)
The Consumer Credit Act 1974 unfair relationship provisions do not apply because the facility was provided to a company and not to an individual, and thus was not a credit agreement under the Act. Even if the provisions applied, no unfair relationship was established.
- Citation
- [2016] NICA 33
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Bank of Ireland (UK) PLC; Defendant/appellant: Dermot McLaughlin
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee, Unfair Relationship, Consumer Credit Agreement, Exempt Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bank of Ireland (UK) PLC
Plaintiff/respondent
Dermot McLaughlin
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Consumer Credit Act 1974 unfair relationship provisions apply to a guarantee for a company debt?
- 2 Was there an unfair relationship between the Bank and the appellant under the Act?
- 3 Did the Bank comply with notice requirements under section 86E of the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Consumer Credit Act 1974 unfair relationship provisions do not apply because the facility was provided to a company and not to an individual, and thus was not a credit agreement under the Act. Even if the provisions applied, no unfair relationship was established.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- leave to amend grounds of appeal refused
- judgment for Bank of Ireland (UK) PLC for £123,000 plus interest upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment