Susinskis v Sean Hagan trading as H2 Engin... [2015] NIIT 1609_14IT (15 January 2015)

The claimant's claims for holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy pay are well-founded due to the respondents' failure to respond and the evidence provided by the claimant.

Citation: [2015] NIIT 1609_14IT
Parties: Claimant: Konstantins Susinskis; Respondent: H2 Engineering (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Sean Hagan trading as H2 Engineering
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 15 January 2015
Procedural Posture: Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision After Hearing; Respondents Debarred for Failure to Respond
Outcome: Claims for holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy pay upheld against Sean Hagan trading as H2 Engineering; H2 Engineering (UK) Ltd dismissed from proceedings.
Legal Topics: Holiday Pay, Notice Pay, Redundancy Pay

Employment Law Holiday Pay Notice Pay Redundancy Pay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7

Parties

Konstantins Susinskis

Claimant

H2 Engineering (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Sean Hagan trading as H2 Engineering

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision After Hearing; Respondents Debarred for Failure to Respond

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant is entitled to holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy pay from the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's claims for holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy pay are well-founded due to the respondents' failure to respond and the evidence provided by the claimant.

Court Disposition

Claims for holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy pay upheld against Sean Hagan trading as H2 Engineering; H2 Engineering (UK) Ltd dismissed from proceedings.

Orders

H2 Engineering (UK) Ltd dismissed from proceedings
Respondent to pay claimant £432 for holiday pay