Orr v Herdmans Limited Herdmans Holdings Limited [2011] NIIT 02012_10IT (23 August 2011)

Orr v Herdmans Limited Herdmans Holdings Limited [2011] NIIT 02012_10IT (23 August 2011)

The tribunal found the claimant was an employee of the second respondent and that the decision was clear; there were no grounds under Rule 34(3) to review the decision, nor any reasonable prospect of the decision being varied or revoked.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] NIIT 02012_10IT
Parties
Claimant: Thomas Neville Orr; Respondent: Herdmans Limited; Respondent: Herdmans Holdings Limited
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
23 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Review
Outcome
Application for review refused
Legal Topics
Redundancy Payment, Employment Status, Review of Tribunal Decision, Contract of Employment
Employment Law Redundancy Payment Employment Status Review of Tribunal Decision Contract of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Neville Orr

Claimant

Herdmans Limited

Respondent

Herdmans Holdings Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was an employee of the second respondent
  2. 2 Whether there are grounds to review the tribunal's decision under Rule 34(3) of the Industrial Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found the claimant was an employee of the second respondent and that the decision was clear; there were no grounds under Rule 34(3) to review the decision, nor any reasonable prospect of the decision being varied or revoked.

Court Disposition

Application for review refused