Carson, Re An Inquest into the Death of [2019] NICoroner 7 (05 June 2019)

Carson, Re An Inquest into the Death of [2019] NICoroner 7 (05 June 2019)

Daniel Carson was unlawfully killed by a gunshot wound to the head on 1 November 1973. The available evidence, including eyewitness identification of S1, was insufficient for criminal prosecution due to lack of corroboration and witness protection concerns. The investigation fell short of modern standards but complied with procedures at the time. No definitive attribution of responsibility to any organisation or individual was possible.

Citation
[2006] NICA 32
Parties
Deceased: Daniel Carson; Next of Kin: Anne Carson; Suspect: S1; Witness: Witness A; Investigating Authority: PSNI; Court: Coroners Service for Northern Ireland
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
05 June 2019
Procedural Posture
Inquest / Final Judgment
Outcome
Unlawful killing; open verdict
Legal Topics
Inquest, Murder, Investigation Standards, Article 2 ECHR, Witness Protection, Ballistics, Evidence Admissibility
Criminal Law Human Rights Law Inquest Murder Investigation Standards Article 2 ECHR Witness Protection Ballistics +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Carson

Deceased

Anne Carson

Next of Kin

S1

Suspect

Witness A

Witness

PSNI

Investigating Authority

Coroners Service for Northern Ireland

Court

Procedural Posture

Inquest / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was Daniel Carson unlawfully killed?
  2. 2 Was the investigation compliant with Article 2 ECHR?
  3. 3 Was S1 involved in the death of Daniel Carson?

Ratio Decidendi

Daniel Carson was unlawfully killed by a gunshot wound to the head on 1 November 1973. The available evidence, including eyewitness identification of S1, was insufficient for criminal prosecution due to lack of corroboration and witness protection concerns. The investigation fell short of modern standards but complied with procedures at the time. No definitive attribution of responsibility to any organisation or individual was possible.

Court Disposition

Unlawful killing; open verdict

Orders

  • No person charged; inquest concluded
  • Particulars recorded for Births and Deaths Registration