Ross, Inquest into the Death of [2019] NICoroner 14 (27 February 2019)
James Ross did not receive TRiM during or after his HERRICK 15 tour because he did not experience events traumatic enough to warrant it. There was no causal link between lack of TRiM and his death. Although POSM records were incomplete, evidence suggests he likely completed the process and there was no causal connection between any procedural deficiency and his death. No systemic defect or omission contributed to his death. The inquest complied with Article 2 ECHR requirements.
- Citation
- [2019] NICoroner 14
- Parties
- Deceased: Lance Corporal James Ross; Next of Kin: Mrs Linda Ketcher; Interested Party: Ministry of Defence; Coroner: Coroner for Northern Ireland, Mr Joseph McCrisken
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Inquest / Final Factual Findings and Conclusions
- Outcome
- Death by hanging; suicide. No systemic defect or procedural failure causally contributed to the death.
- Legal Topics
- Inquest Procedure, Article 2 ECHR Compliance, Military Welfare, Suicide, Post Operational Stress Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lance Corporal James Ross
Deceased
Mrs Linda Ketcher
Next of Kin
Ministry of Defence
Interested Party
Coroner for Northern Ireland, Mr Joseph McCrisken
Coroner
Procedural Posture
Inquest / Final Factual Findings and Conclusions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Lance Corporal James Ross's death was causally linked to failures in Trauma Risk Management (TRiM) or Post Operational Stress Management (POSM) procedures
- 2 Whether any systemic defects contributed to the death
- 3 Compliance with Article 2 ECHR inquest requirements
Ratio Decidendi
James Ross did not receive TRiM during or after his HERRICK 15 tour because he did not experience events traumatic enough to warrant it. There was no causal link between lack of TRiM and his death. Although POSM records were incomplete, evidence suggests he likely completed the process and there was no causal connection between any procedural deficiency and his death. No systemic defect or omission contributed to his death. The inquest complied with Article 2 ECHR requirements.
Court Disposition
Death by hanging; suicide. No systemic defect or procedural failure causally contributed to the death.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment