Greer, R v [2012] NICC 20 (18 May 2012)

Greer, R v [2012] NICC 20 (18 May 2012)

The court found that the defendant posed a significant risk of serious harm to the public, taking into account his extensive criminal record, escalation in offending, lack of remorse, and partial admission to a pending attempted murder charge. An extended sentence was necessary for public protection.

Citation
[2012] NICC 20
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: James Greer
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
18 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Arson, Recklessness, Dangerousness Assessment, Extended Sentence, Public Protection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

James Greer

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the defendant poses a significant risk of serious harm to the public
  2. 2 Whether an extended sentence is justified under relevant legislation
  3. 3 Whether pending charges can be considered in dangerousness assessment

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant posed a significant risk of serious harm to the public, taking into account his extensive criminal record, escalation in offending, lack of remorse, and partial admission to a pending attempted murder charge. An extended sentence was necessary for public protection.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Defendant sentenced to 3 years imprisonment with an extended licence period of 2 years.
  • Defendant to reside in hostel accommodation upon release and participate in a cognitive change programme.