Jamieson v AIB [2013] NICA 42 (28 January 2013)

Jamieson v AIB [2013] NICA 42 (28 January 2013)

The Tribunal correctly applied the Officious Bystander Test and Business Efficacy Test and found no implied contractual provision entitling the appellant to withhold payments; no error in law was identified.

Citation
[2013] NICA 42
Parties
Appellant: Jamieson; Respondent: AIB
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
28 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Implied Terms, Contractual Payments, Business Efficacy, Officious Bystander Test
Employment Law Contract Law Implied Terms Contractual Payments Business Efficacy Officious Bystander Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jamieson

Appellant

AIB

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by finding no implied contractual provision entitling the appellant to withhold contractual payments

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal correctly applied the Officious Bystander Test and Business Efficacy Test and found no implied contractual provision entitling the appellant to withhold payments; no error in law was identified.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Ground C not made out
  • Appeal dismissed