Boyd v John Graham (Dromore) Ltd [2006] NIFET 389_04FET (04 July 2006)

No evidence supported discrimination; recruitment was conducted objectively and lawfully, and the successful candidate was selected based on interview performance, not religious or political factors.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2006] NIFET 389_04FET
Parties: Claimant: Wesley Boyd; Respondent: John Graham (Dromore) Ltd
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 04 July 2006
Procedural Posture: Employment Discrimination / Final Judgment
Outcome: claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Religious Discrimination, Political Opinion Discrimination, Recruitment Procedures

Employment Law Anti Discrimination Law Religious Discrimination Political Opinion Discrimination Recruitment Procedures

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Wesley Boyd

Claimant

John Graham (Dromore) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Discrimination / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of religious belief or political opinion in failing to offer him a job

Ratio Decidendi

No evidence supported discrimination; recruitment was conducted objectively and lawfully, and the successful candidate was selected based on interview performance, not religious or political factors.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.