Young v John McKee SolicitorsLeonard Edgar [2017] NIIT 02194_16IT (04 May 2017)
The second bullet point in the claimant's replies to Additional Information is to be removed as inadmissible, but the remainder of the document is relevant and must be included in the hearing bundle.
- Citation
- [2017] NIIT 02194_16IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Roberta Young; Respondent: John McKee Solicitors; Respondent: Leonard Edgar
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
- Outcome
- Application to remove the second bullet point from the replies to Additional Information granted; remainder of document to be included in the hearing bundle.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Admissibility of Evidence, Relevance of Evidence, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roberta Young
Claimant
John McKee Solicitors
Respondent
Leonard Edgar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a paragraph in the claimant's replies to Additional Information should be removed on grounds of relevance
- 2 Whether the document containing replies to Additional Information is relevant and should be included in the hearing bundle
Ratio Decidendi
The second bullet point in the claimant's replies to Additional Information is to be removed as inadmissible, but the remainder of the document is relevant and must be included in the hearing bundle.
Court Disposition
Application to remove the second bullet point from the replies to Additional Information granted; remainder of document to be included in the hearing bundle.
Orders
- Second bullet point in the statement of additional information provided to the respondent on 2 March is removed from that document.
- Revised response to the Notice for Additional Information must be provided to the respondent and included in the hearing bundle.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment